Imagine with us a time in the future where First Baptist Church is entirely convinced that it is our responsibility as a local church to bring the gospel of Jesus Christ across geographic, linguistic, and ethnic barriers. Realizing that we have limited resources (people and finances) we decide to be very focused on a handful of missionaries who are engaged in evangelism and the planting and strengthening of churches. We are so convinced of this that a significant portion of our annual budget is earmarked for this endeavour alone. But it’s not only money that we give to this endeavour. What if we actively engage in training up our missionaries to go into all the world? What if some of our people make commitments and we come alongside them and provide half their support? If we know them before they go, we will be praying for them! When they have a need, we will send them a short-term team to help! When they get discouraged, we will bombard them with prayer, emails, letters, care packages and, if possible, visits! Then when they come home for furlough, half of their time will be with us! This model will help solidify our relationship with the missionary and aid their effectiveness on the field. In other words, we would rather go deep with a few than shallow with many.
Considering these convictions, we believe the following items are necessary:
FBC recognizes that our above definitions could leave out the importance of working towards the planting of churches in Canada, as well as the importance of being engaged in various mercy ministries (e.g., widow, poor, vulnerable). We would suggest that the FBC vision and budget would not ignore the importance of these ministries. Our budget should reflect separate lines for each of these important areas of ministry; for the sake of clarity, we see the wisdom in highlighting these distinctions.
This assessment tool is meant to guide the process of deciding whether an individual or married couple is the right fit to become a missionary candidate with FBC. The following questions assume that FBC has a relationship with the candidate to have answered these questions well. The questions should be given a rating from 1 to 5 (with 5 being a strong affirmation). We would suggest that the elders complete this assessment and give the candidate a green light (an excellent fit with FBC Missions), a yellow light (we see definite potential but have some suggestions for next steps), or a red light (we do not see this candidate as the right fit for FBC; we may or may not encourage the candidate to pursue other churches).
Once a candidate has been assessed and given a green light by the elders, the final step would be to have the FBC members vote in agreement with this decision.